The Who By Numbers

| The Who

Cabbagescale

100%
  • Reviews Counted:26

Listeners Score

0%liked it
  • Listeners Ratings: 0

The Who By Numbers

The Who by Numbers is the seventh studio album by English rock band The Who, released on 3 October 1975 in the United Kingdom through Polydor Records, and on 25 October 1975 in the United States by MCA Records. It was named the tenth-best album of the year in The Village Voice Pazz & Jop critics poll. -Wikipedia

Critic Reviews

Show All
  • Rolling Stone

    Nov. 1975 Typically, the Who face the fact without flinching. Indeed, they may have made their greatest album in the face of it. But only time will tell. 

    See full Review

  • Ultimate Classic Rock

    Oct. 2015 The result, 1975's The Who by Numbers, proved a critical and commercial triumph in the face of personal adversity. 

    See full Review

  • All Music

    However, his introspective musings are rendered ineffective by Roger Daltrey's bluster and the cloying, lightweight filler of "Squeeze Box." In addition, Townshend's songs tend to be underdeveloped, relying on verbosity instead of melodicism, with only the simple power of "Slip Kid," the grace of "Blue Red and Grey," and John Entwistle's heavy rocker "Success Story" making much of an impact.  

    See full Review

  • Classic Rock Review

    Oct. 2015 The Who made a transitional record with 1975’s The Who By Numbers. The album contains some leftover tracks from early 1970s aborted projects, Lifehouse and Long Live Rock, along with a few other tracks which remain faithful to the group’s classic rock sound.  

    See full Review

  • Sputnik Music

    July 2013 A depressing, autobiographical Pete Townshend record, essential for die hard Who fans.  

    See full Review

  • Sputnik Music

    Feb. 2006 The Who By Numbers, released 1975, is Pete's most personal Who album, one on which he glances inward at himself and produces some of the most beautiful works of the Who's career.  

    See full Review

  • Escapist Magazine

    Set. 2014 I guess it goes without saying that I recommend you get this album if you're a fan of The Who, but even then, I suggest you check some of the songs to see if it's up your alley: it took me a few listens before I could get into it.  

    See full Review

  • Vintage Rock

    The Who By Numbers, the Who’s seventh album, might just be the band’s forgotten masterpiece. It’s an album that’s deeply personal, yet playfully deceitful. Mostly, it’s a lost gem time has been good to — worthy of repeated playbacks for years to come. 

    See full Review

  • Tangled Up In Music

    July 2013 So this album doesn’t even set out to do that, marking a return to the basic “unrelated songs” ideology. Reprises and instrumentals? Nope, no such thing here. Layers of synthesizers and dozens of hours spent in studio? Not at all. Just songs. Some great, some good, and some decent enough. So what makes this album stand above the majority of its contemporary records?  

    See full Review

  • Prog Sphere

    Speaking musically, there are no complex compositions here, or any form of progressive mentality to the music. Instead, these are straightforward rock songs, doing rock ‘by the numbers’ so to speak. 

    See full Review

  • Warr

    two songs are classics: the manic, impishly smutty hillbilly romp "Squeeze Box" (a Top 40 hit), and the tightly arranged, goosestepping "Slip Kid," where the whole band shines. But don't move on to this until you have the earlier 70s Who records.  

    See full Review

  • Keno

    2003 Overall, it might not be their best album, but it has stood the test of time nicely. 

    See full Review

  • Darren Goossens

    May 2016 This is not a great album. But it is an interesting and oddly beguiling one. 

    See full Review

  • Musicko

    Oct. 2009 As a fan, I find “By Numbers” appealing because it does sound good and I find it invaluable to see how Pete’s artistic vision was evolving. But non-fans won’t be that thrilled. Not at all. 

    See full Review

  • Starling

    Depressing, and, unfortunately, not very satisfying musically. Where are the melodies?  

    See full Review

  • Ultimate Guitar

    Oct 2006 All in all, it is worth checking out. 

    See full Review

  • Elusive Disc

    Having to follow four monumental releases in succession, The Who By Numbers is often overlooked and unfairly overshadowed.  

    See full Review

  • Murashev

    Oct. 2005 Album gets better with age. The lyrics display The Who struggling for relevance in the mid 1970's. The playing and singing is raw and crisp. It still remains under rated after all these years.  

    See full Review

  • NME

    One of The Who’s most poignant and personal LPs  

    See full Review

  • Sound and Music

    An undervalued and unjustly neglected record by many. Produced by Glyn Johns and published in 1975, this album is undoubtedly less ambitious than the previous ones, but this did not prevent him from overcoming the inexorable passage of the years. In what could be his most sincere and personal record, Pete Townshend sings with brutal sincerity. 

    See full Review

  • Melodic

    I admit I didn't like the album that much back then but I have learned to love it later on.  

    See full Review

  • Whitgunn

    “The Who by Numbers functions as Pete Townshend's confessional singer/songwriter album, as he chronicles his problems with alcohol  

    See full Review

  • Popflock

    The songs on the album were, for the most part, more introspective and personal than many other songs that the band had released. 

    See full Review

  • Sputnik Music

    Dec.2006 While it does take the listener through the deranged thoughts and worries of Pete Townshend, the mostly upbeat tunes and elementary instrumentation can make for a quick and easy listen.  

    See full Review

  • The Jonesy Report

    Following up greatness has always been a difficult task.  

    See full Review

  • Daily Vault

    July 2006 If you want to listen to The Who just play, pick up The Who By Numbers.  

    See full Review

Rate This Album and Leave Your Comments